Gigantic discover a huge face alien in Antarctica using Google Earth Structure belonging to a lost civilization or simple pareidolia? The worrisome melting of Antarctica seems to be revealing interesting structures …
A structure similar to a gigantic face has been discovered in Antarctica through Google Earth, software with which this type of oddity is found every so often, whether in our world, on the moon or on Mars. “It seems to be some kind of mega-structure similar to the famous face of Mars (Cidonia),” says the video about it published on the Thirdfaceofmoon channel. “The symmetry it has is amazing.” The mysterious “face”, which according to some users has “alien appearance”, looks out from the melted snow of the mountains in West Antarctica and can be visualized by entering the following coordinates: 72 ° 00′36.00 ″ S, 168 ° 34’40.00 “AND
With a broad forehead, slanted eyes, nose and mouth, it is about 600 meters wide by almost 1 kilometer long, hence its nickname: “Gigántica” (acronym between Giant and Antarctic). «Could this be something that has been left of some ancient Antarctic civilization? The melting of Antarctica could reveal structures that will shock the world, ”says the owner of the YouTube channel, who credits the finding to the user ufo_scandinavia. Internet users, for their part, expressed a plethora of opinions about it. “This is not something natural that Mother Nature did with wind and ice”; “There is no optical illusion, this is really a face”; «This is purely natural and random. It just seems crushed ice, ”were some of the comments. Perhaps the alleged pyramids on the white continent are not alone … Do you. what do you think?
Genesis 6:4 – ‘There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown’.
Numbers 13:33 – ‘And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight’.
Deuteronomy 1:28 – ‘Whither shall we go up? our brethren have discouraged our heart, saying, the people are greater and taller than we; the cities are great and walled up to heaven; and moreover we have seen the sons of the Anakims there’.
2:10 – ‘The Emims dwelt therein in times past, a people great, and many, and tall, as the Anakims; 11 Which also were accounted giants, as the Anakims; but the Moabites called them Emims’.
2:20 – References to a ‘race’ of giants who: ‘dwelt therein in old time; and the Ammonites call them Zamzummims; 21 A people great, and many, and tall, as the Anakims; but the LORD destroyed them before them; and they succeeded them, and dwelt in their stead’:
3:11 – ‘For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of giants; behold his bedstead was a bedstead of iron; is it not in Rabbath of the children of Ammon? nine cubits was the length thereof, and four cubits the breadth of it, after the cubit of a man’. (This bed is 6 feet wide, 14 feet long and King Og’s height is estimated at least 12 feet.)
Joshua xv. 14; Judges i. 20; and Numbers xiii. 33 – ANAK, father of the Anakim. ‘The Hebrew spies said they were mere grass-hoppers in comparison with these giants’
Archaeologists had no idea how huge their project was when they started excavating in Sântana, Romania, almost a decade ago. Only now do they realize that they are dealing with huge remains of the Bronze Age Citadel. More specifically, it is a fortress that was three times larger than the known Troy.
›› The Archaeological Intelligence Network reported that a joint team of Romanian and German archaeologists began excavating the Romanian citadel in 2009. For a while, their work on the excavations was interrupted, but a few years ago they were back together and work intensified. Since then, they have been able to identify the remains of the 3400-year-old citadel, which covers 89 hectares.
The head of the Romanian researchers’ section, Florin Gogâltan, of the Institute of Archeology and Art History of the Romanian Academy in Cluj-Napoca ›› compared the following two archaeological excavations: